The Craft Of Writing Editorials
1. the leader provides consist in the readers problem.
2. The Workers Conditions
3. the industrial manufactures are vital national interest like energy
4. workers are distinctly unimpressive claims that higher wages.
5. i think the workers could just work a little harder to not become poor.
6. courage ot reject the demands of the national restaurant association
7. the hard-to-enforce understanding that tips will make up the rest of the way to at least 8 per hour.
8.the argument is about the workers preventing to become poor.
9. by supporting the poor people with more money.
10. so they can make more money
11. he did not have legal property.
12. the have a argument about both things.
13. it happens all the time monthly
14. she prevents more than one source
15. the paragraphs throughout the article is mostly due to poor & they fight a lot due to the workers.
3. the industrial manufactures are vital national interest like energy
4. workers are distinctly unimpressive claims that higher wages.
5. i think the workers could just work a little harder to not become poor.
6. courage ot reject the demands of the national restaurant association
7. the hard-to-enforce understanding that tips will make up the rest of the way to at least 8 per hour.
8.the argument is about the workers preventing to become poor.
9. by supporting the poor people with more money.
10. so they can make more money
11. he did not have legal property.
12. the have a argument about both things.
13. it happens all the time monthly
14. she prevents more than one source
15. the paragraphs throughout the article is mostly due to poor & they fight a lot due to the workers.
1. The lead not the leader. I don't understand your sentence here. The lead give a specific example (a dishwasher) to provide an example that the reader can relate to.
ReplyDelete2. Good. But what about those conditions? The restaurant industry is booming yet at the same time wages are more unequal in this country than ever before.
3. The point at this point in the article is that restaurants workers don't provide a vital national interest (like oil or electrical power), so the industry should not be allowed to pay workers less because they say the industry might go under if they pay more.
5. That's a good counter argument for you. But what arguments does the author make?
6. That's what lawyers should do. What about consumers?
7. I am not sure if you understand this point. This is what the National Restaurant Association is arguing is the correct way to pay restaurant workers.
8. Your sentence for this question is not clear. Restaurant owners say that if they pay their workers more, they will have to have fewer workers to prevent from going out of business.
9. The author says that is not true because all owners will have to pay workers more so everyone will just adjust and compete normally.
10. Yes. Because they have to make more money. One job won't cut it.
11. But why talk so much about just one person in the middle of the article?
12. Not sure what you mean here. She describes their lawbreaking by explaining wage theft.
13. How much exactly?
14. She says the mayor should reduce red tape and also prevent permit renewal for restaurants known to be practicing wage theft.
15. The last paragraph is really, really short. Why?
You do better when you answer the questions in your own words. When you just quote phrases from the article, I am not sure what point you are trying to make.
75